In the world of music creation, it is not uncommon for artists to draw inspiration from existing material to create something new. This is a step in the creative process known as sampling, which involves taking portions of pre-existing sound recordings and incorporating them into a new composition to create something unique.

Music sampling is a powerful tool for artistic expression and has become a widespread practice, gaining increasing popularity in the music industry, particularly in the digital age. 

However, this practice straddles the boundary of copyright and is therefore accompanied by a complex set of legal considerations governed by copyright law, intellectual property rights, and various international agreements. 

But despite this legal framework, music sampling remains a common source of copyright infringement, so let’s take a look at what is allowed under copyright law when it comes to music sampling.

1. Understanding the basics of copyright law

Before we look at music sampling, let’s take a moment to understand the basic principles of copyright law.

Copyright is a legal framework that grants exclusive rights to the creators of original works, including literary, artistic, and musical creations. These rights cover the right to reproduce, distribute, perform, and create derivative works based on the original material. In the case of music, these rights apply to both the musical composition (the underlying musical work) and the sound recording (the specific recording of that work).

This means that any unauthorized copying or use of copyright material without the permission of the copyright holder is considered an infringement.

Now, before we move on to music sampling, there are a couple of things to bear in mind. It’s important to note that not all material is protected by copyright. Public domain works, for example, are not covered by copyright protection and can be freely used, reproduced, and distributed by artists who can sample and remix them without asking permission or giving payment. 

Public domain rules vary from country to country, but in general, creative work may enter the public domain either because the creator has explicitly waived his or her rights through a declaration or license, or because the copyright holder has not renewed his or her copyright, or because the work in question was not eligible for copyright, or because the copyright has expired. Indeed, copyright protection is limited in time and the duration of copyright varies according to the jurisdiction and the type of work, but it generally lasts for a certain number of years after the death of the creator or a fixed number of years from the date of creation or publication.

Finally, it is important to bear in mind that copyright laws vary from country to country and that while the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, an international agreement governing copyright, establishes minimum standards for the protection of intellectual property, the implementation and interpretation of these standards can vary, creating a complex system of regulations for artists involved in cross-border collaborations or seeking to distribute their music internationally.

2. What is the fair use doctrine?

There are exceptions to these exclusive rights that allow for the use of copyrighted material under the fair use doctrine. Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without the need to obtain permission from or pay the copyright holder, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.

Fair use may not apply where the use is commercial, extensive, or has a significant impact on the market for the original work, and there are generally four factors taken into account when considering fair use. These are the purpose of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the extent of the sample used, and the effect on the market.

3. Music sampling and copyright infringement cases

Let’s take a look at music sampling. Artists often want to incorporate snippets of existing sound recordings into their work, and this can be various elements of a recording, including instrumental riffs, vocal lines, drum beats, or other sound effects. Sampling is an important element in a number of musical genres, particularly hip-hop, electronic, and dance music. It has played an important role in the evolution of music and has contributed to the diversity of musical styles and genres, as it allows artists to creatively integrate elements from different sources, creating unique and innovative sounds.

However, as we have seen previously, unauthorized use of copyrighted samples can lead to legal problems. On suspicion of copyright infringement, the copyright holder may issue a cease and desist letter, requiring the alleged infringer to cease using the copyrighted material, and failure to comply with this letter may result in legal action, including the pursuit of damages for any loss suffered by the copyright holder.

There’s a saying that goes “There’s nothing new under the sun” and it sometimes seems that everything has been done before, or that new creations are often variations or combinations of previous ones.

Despite this, legal battles over music sampling have shaped the landscape of copyright law, setting important precedents in the music industry and we’ve also seen a rise in music copyright cases in recent years.

One of the most notable cases is Grand Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc (1991), where rapper Biz Markie’s unauthorized use of a Gilbert O’Sullivan sample resulted in a ruling that significantly tightened the reins on unlicensed sampling. Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films (2005) further clarified the legal landscape by stating that any unauthorized sampling, no matter how small, constitutes copyright infringement. 

Another famous case is the high-profile copyright infringement trial over the hit song “Blurred Lines“, in which Marvin Gaye’s family accused Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams of plagiarising Gaye’s song “Got to Give It Up”. Marvin Gaye’s family won the case when the jury decided that the “feel” or “groove” of the two songs was sufficiently similar to constitute copyright infringement, although there was no similarity between the specific musical elements of the two songs.

Other big names, such as Ed Sheeran and Katy Perry, have recently been caught up in music copyright cases, which have highlighted the complexities of copyright law in the context of artistic expression, and the impact this has on creativity. 

But if we go back to the old saying “there’s nothing new under the sun”, when Olivia Rodrigo was accused of plagiarising Elvis Costello’s ‘Pump it Up’ in her song ‘Brutal’, Costello responded by saying: “I don’t mind. “That’s how rock and roll works. You take the broken pieces of another thrill and make a whole new toy out of it.” He later added: “That’s what I did.

4. Obtaining a license from the copyright holder or multiple rights holders

Let’s face it, very few people are like Elvis Costello and if you intend to take a sample from an original work that is still protected by copyright, you need to obtain a license from the copyright holder or multiple rights holders, including those who hold the copyright in the composition and those who hold the copyright in the sound recording. The process can be lengthy and costly, and the license usually requires payment of royalties to the copyright holder and may have specific conditions attached, but it provides legal certainty and guarantees that the new work is free from any claims of infringement, allowing you, as a sampler, to use the copyrighted material in your new composition.

As we saw above, there can be legal consequences for not obtaining permission before sampling a copyrighted work, including claims of copyright infringement, cease and desist orders, and potential financial penalties.

If you need help navigating the process, there are companies specializing in sampling clearance services that help artists obtain the necessary clearances and negotiate licenses.

5. What are Creative Commons licenses?

Some artists distribute their works under Creative Commons licenses, which are a set of public copyright licenses that allow creators to specify the permissions they grant to others to use their works. There are several types of Creative Commons licenses, each with its own set of permissions. 

The most basic license is an attribution license, also known as a CC BY license, and it only requires users to give proper credit to the original creator when using the work. You also have a ShareAlike license, known as CC BY-SA, which allows others to distribute derivative works based on the original, but only under the same or a similar license to the original work. The non-commercial license, known as CC BY-NC, allows others to remix, modify, and develop the work for non-commercial purposes, and although the new material must also credit the author and be non-commercial, it is not obliged to license the derivative work under the same license conditions.

The NoDerivs license, known as CC BY-ND, allows redistribution, commercial or otherwise, provided the work is used in its original, unmodified form and the original author is credited. 

6. What about music sampling in the digital age?

Sampling has become a fundamental aspect of various musical genres, from hip-hop to electronic music, and while this has given rise to concerns about copyright infringement, this is all the more true as the technology evolves. Indeed, the rise of digital sampling technology has revolutionized the music industry, offering artists unprecedented tools for creative expression, especially as software and hardware samplers allow musicians to manipulate and rearrange existing sounds in unprecedented ways. 

In response, copyright laws must adapt to take account of the nuances of digital sampling and strike a balance between protecting the rights of original creators and encouraging artistic innovation.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is an American copyright law that was enacted in 1998 to address various issues related to copyright protection in the digital age. The DMCA provides a framework for dealing with copyright infringement on the Internet and includes provisions that address online copyright infringement and the liability of online service providers who are granted certain immunities if they respond promptly to takedown notices from copyright owners.

—

Send your music directly to curators and pros, and get it heard! 👇